<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naming Beneficiaries on Retirement Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myretirementblog.com/naming-beneficiaries-on-retirement-plans.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/naming-beneficiaries-on-retirement-plans.html</link>
	<description>Retire happy, healthy and wise.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/naming-beneficiaries-on-retirement-plans.html#comment-65028</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 04:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myretirementblog.com/?p=337#comment-65028</guid>
		<description>I have been reading a lot about 401k retirements benefits  and I am amazed that regardless of the circumstances you have to get your spouse's permission to designate a beneficiary other than a spouse. 
Suppose for example that I decided to remarry but wanted to leave my 401k to my daughter from my fist marriage. All the money that I have worked hard to save for the last 20 years I will have to get permission from my new husband to leave to my Child. If after the marriage he refuses then I either get a divorce or he gets all my life savings in the event of my death and my daughter gets nothing. Why are more people not aghast about this law, about that fact that what for most people is their sole means of saving the money they have worked so had for the government dictates who this money has to be left to. This law is so wrong. 

Please help me understand the reasoning behind this law. I could tell you one thing  I will not be getting remarried.  

If an employee has a  401k beneficiary before marriage,  then gets married is the 401k plan administrator obligated to inform the employee that he/she needs spousal consent to designate a non spousal beneficiary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading a lot about 401k retirements benefits  and I am amazed that regardless of the circumstances you have to get your spouse&#8217;s permission to designate a beneficiary other than a spouse.<br />
Suppose for example that I decided to remarry but wanted to leave my 401k to my daughter from my fist marriage. All the money that I have worked hard to save for the last 20 years I will have to get permission from my new husband to leave to my Child. If after the marriage he refuses then I either get a divorce or he gets all my life savings in the event of my death and my daughter gets nothing. Why are more people not aghast about this law, about that fact that what for most people is their sole means of saving the money they have worked so had for the government dictates who this money has to be left to. This law is so wrong. </p>
<p>Please help me understand the reasoning behind this law. I could tell you one thing  I will not be getting remarried.  </p>
<p>If an employee has a  401k beneficiary before marriage,  then gets married is the 401k plan administrator obligated to inform the employee that he/she needs spousal consent to designate a non spousal beneficiary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Money Hacks Carnival #17 at Mrs Nespy&#8217;s Frugal World &#124; Money Hackers Network</title>
		<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/naming-beneficiaries-on-retirement-plans.html#comment-64970</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Hacks Carnival #17 at Mrs Nespy&#8217;s Frugal World &#124; Money Hackers Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myretirementblog.com/?p=337#comment-64970</guid>
		<description>[...] presents Naming Beneficiaries on Retirement Plans posted at My Retirement Blog. Okay, so we don&#8217;t want to have to think about it, but this is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] presents Naming Beneficiaries on Retirement Plans posted at My Retirement Blog. Okay, so we don&#8217;t want to have to think about it, but this is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanguard LifeStrategy Funds :: My Retirement Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/naming-beneficiaries-on-retirement-plans.html#comment-64936</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanguard LifeStrategy Funds :: My Retirement Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myretirementblog.com/?p=337#comment-64936</guid>
		<description>[...] 156th Carnival of Personal Finance is available at PT Money and my post on Naming Beneficiaries on Retirement Plans was included. Tags:  Mutual Funds, Vanguard Related Posts Vanguard Retirement FundsRolling Over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 156th Carnival of Personal Finance is available at PT Money and my post on Naming Beneficiaries on Retirement Plans was included. Tags:  Mutual Funds, Vanguard Related Posts Vanguard Retirement FundsRolling Over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 156th Carnival of Personal Finance: Songs of Summer &#124; Prime Time Money</title>
		<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/naming-beneficiaries-on-retirement-plans.html#comment-64934</link>
		<dc:creator>The 156th Carnival of Personal Finance: Songs of Summer &#124; Prime Time Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myretirementblog.com/?p=337#comment-64934</guid>
		<description>[...] retirehappy from My Retirement Blog presents Naming Beneficiaries on Retirement Plans. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] retirehappy from My Retirement Blog presents Naming Beneficiaries on Retirement Plans. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
