<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Weak Case Against Roth IRAs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html</link>
	<description>Retire happy, healthy and wise.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: oysterthepearl</title>
		<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html#comment-59111</link>
		<dc:creator>oysterthepearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html#comment-59111</guid>
		<description>Regarding this statement:

“It’s an admirable try at it and a great way to get yourself and your firm in the papers but I think it’s deeply flawed“.

I agree, I sent a note to this firm about this article and they didn’t answer my questions.  They just wanted me to fill out a form disclosing my net worth complete with my Social Security number.  This is just a ploy to get customers.  Steer clear of these idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding this statement:</p>
<p>“It’s an admirable try at it and a great way to get yourself and your firm in the papers but I think it’s deeply flawed“.</p>
<p>I agree, I sent a note to this firm about this article and they didn’t answer my questions.  They just wanted me to fill out a form disclosing my net worth complete with my Social Security number.  This is just a ploy to get customers.  Steer clear of these idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retirehappy</title>
		<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html#comment-58287</link>
		<dc:creator>retirehappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html#comment-58287</guid>
		<description>That's interesting about the 33% tax bracket observation, in my experience I've seen a lot more written with the assumption of the 25% tax bracket... but that's probably because I'm in that bracket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting about the 33% tax bracket observation, in my experience I&#8217;ve seen a lot more written with the assumption of the 25% tax bracket&#8230; but that&#8217;s probably because I&#8217;m in that bracket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html#comment-57929</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html#comment-57929</guid>
		<description>One other aside:
I hate how so many articles written about tax deductibility assumes that the reader will be in the 33% tax bracket. I cannot imagine that many single people make over $160,850 a year. The marriage penalized $195,850 for a couple is somewhat more reasonable, but that is still higher than the vast majority of earners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other aside:<br />
I hate how so many articles written about tax deductibility assumes that the reader will be in the 33% tax bracket. I cannot imagine that many single people make over $160,850 a year. The marriage penalized $195,850 for a couple is somewhat more reasonable, but that is still higher than the vast majority of earners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html#comment-57927</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myretirementblog.com/a-weak-case-against-roth-iras.html#comment-57927</guid>
		<description>My first thought was the deductibility limits. I think this advice only applies if you are not able to be an active participant. Of course, in that case, you probably should be maxing out both your Roth and your Traditional to think about having enough for retirement :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought was the deductibility limits. I think this advice only applies if you are not able to be an active participant. Of course, in that case, you probably should be maxing out both your Roth and your Traditional to think about having enough for retirement :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
